At the meeting place Dellacona found not only Ardito but also defendants Ventimiglia and Russo. /Filter /FlateDecode >> Whether some time prior to trial, just before the trial begins or just before the witness testifies will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case, but at one of those times the prosecutor should ask for a ruling out of the presence of the jury at which the evidence to be produced can be detailed to the court, either as an offer of proof by counsel or, preferably, by presenting the live testimony of the witness (Dolan, op cit , supra, 49 So Cal L Rev, at p 255; Rothblatt and Leroy, The Motion in Limine in Criminal Trials: A Technique for the Pretrial Exclusion of Prejudicial Evidence, 60 Ky LJ 611; Ann., 63 ALR3d 311). % Before resolving the dilemma of not frustrating the purpose of this section or not frustrating the prosecutor's strategy, the appropriate designation of this hearing as either a Ventimiglia Hearing or a Molineux Hearing will be made, because of the inconsistency of the appellate court decisions in citing these hearings. In New York State, where Weinstein is going to be tried, the Doctrine of Chances is known as The Molineux Rule, which gets its name from a New York State Court of Appeals decision in the case of People v. Molineux. The exception is used rarely in New York State, because evidence of prior similar bad acts is considered highly prejudicial. 2023 NY Slip Op 50130 (U) Decided on February 7, 2023. Concluding that the shop was too busy, Ventimiglia returned to the bowling alley parking lot and together Dellacona, Ventimiglia, Russo and Ardito departed for Mattana's residence in Lloyd Harbor. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information. Under certain circumstances . After a pretrial Molineux/Ventimiglia hearing, County Court ruled, among other things, that the People as part of their direct case could introduce evidence that defendant had made sexual advances toward three other young teenage girls as evidence of a common scheme or plan and to demonstrate lack of mistake and motive. Contact us. However, the defendant, in accordance with CPL 200.60(3)(a), has admitted this prior conviction, so it normally would be inadmissible at his trial (see People v. Cooper, 78 N.Y.2d 476, 577 N.Y.S.2d 202, 583 N.E.2d 915; People v. Smart, 190 A.D.2d 942, 593 N.Y.S.2d 608; People v. Sawyer, 188 A.D.2d 939, 592 N.Y.S.2d 92). The New York Weekly Roundup - Criminal Appeals is a blog and video podcast by appellate and post-conviction attorney Patrick Michael Megaro summarizing the latest developments in criminal law . FRIEDMAN: That guy just happened to be Roland Molineux's romantic rival. %PDF-1.4 % The People are urged to make an appropriate decision in this regard sufficiently in advance of trial to allow any Ventimiglia/ Molineux hearing to be consolidated and held with any other hearings ordered herein. trial. Efforts to quantify the degree of probativeness necessary for admission establish that the evidence must be of more than "slight value" (People v Allweiss, supra, at 47), but the authorities are not in agreement concerning whether it must be "highly probative" (id.., at pp 47 and 49), simply "directly probative" (People v Vails, supra, at p 368; People v Jackson, supra, at 68), or "substantially relevant" (McCormick, Evidence [2d ed], 190, p 447), phrases which are themselves not entirely distinguishable. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 (1901), known as a Molineaux hearing, is a hearing to determine whether evidence of uncharged crimes or bad acts of the can be admitted or introduced in evidence at trial. of evidence of prior uncharged crimes by the defendant in a criminal In most cases evidence of prior uncharged crimes is not admissible People in general are equally horrified at hearing the Christian religion doubted, and at seeing it practised.Samuel Butler (18351902). In order to introduce evidence of uncharged crimes or bad acts, the prosecution must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the probative effect (the value of the evidence and its ability to prove a necessary fact) is greater than the prejudicial effect it has on the Defendant. He appealed the case. den., 92 N.Y.2d 901, 680 N.Y.S.2d 65, 702 N.E.2d 850); as a Molineux Hearing in the same situation (e.g., People v. Vaughn, 209 A.D.2d 459, 619 N.Y.S.2d 573, app. if the evidence is admissible. Danny Cevallos, How Weinstein lawyers casting couch comment could impact his defense strategy, NBC News (May 27, 2018), https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/how-weinstein-lawyer-s-casting-couch-comment-could-impact-his-n877916. The three women are telling their stories of going to what they thought were business meetings only to be subject to what they say was sexually abusive behavior. xZnH}W,-bf0 0XL`IHVN]]]u&}}xxgn]uY6:OOj3SK5ee[0-wY|)\T*zY|,uoCmI6>d/*s%F0d8* a=5XNy[co\H~q&:,:C&/B?U5mn+7"&.>-~aCSvyu=vf$C h~';ZeUFnA]V/kk:buU%O6|4!mG;opGE3_,Hh22/)Jl_}$!O|G558_g]9@ b4 yDyEw*d{T[vQDYZI! SCHECTER: Molineux was sent to Sing Sing and sentenced to be electrocuted in what came to be called Old Sparky - you know, the electric chair. Footnote 1: Denial of a mistrial after severing the trial as to defendant Ardito was not error in view of the fact that much of the testimony as to her did not relate to defendants and of the Trial Judge's careful instructions to the jury as to what testimony should be excluded. Molineux. After a pretrial Molineux/Ventimiglia hearing, County-3- 100063 Court ruled, among other things, that the People - as part of their direct case - could introduce evidence that defendant had . "The Molineux Rule: How This Exception to the Rules of Evidence Could Impact the Harvey Weinstein Trial Syracuse Law Review", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molineux_hearing&oldid=936346821, This page was last edited on 18 January 2020, at 06:44. The first two sentences constitute direct evidence of agreement between Russo and Ventimiglia, but not of an agreement to kill. 0000000948 00000 n . Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. NPR's Rose Friedman reports on how this exception to normal rules of evidence came to be used in New York. The judge decides if the evidence is admissible. This compromise safeguards the rights of the defendant and also the rights of the prosecutor. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law 431. 0000001269 00000 n Defendants were indicted together with Victoria Ardito and charged with the murder of her lover, Benjamin Mattana. Under certain circumstances it may be admissible. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. So Roland Molineux was living a good life. Nor is it clear whether the trial court read the hearing transcript or conducted its own de novo hearing. Douglas Wigdor represents one of them - Tarale Wulff. In her system, doctors found a deadly poison - cyanide of mercury. den. Sandoval hearing is if the defendant testifies what bad acts/convictions can he be cross examined about. This is called the MIMIC rule, and can also be found in Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The latter statement would, of course, be mere pretext; Mattana was to be taken from his house to be murdered. Defendant argues that he was excluded when the People made an application, pursuant to People v Molineux (168 NY 264), to question him about the facts of a prior conviction and that the conference that ensued was essentially a hearing pursuant to People v Ventimiglia (52 NY2d 350) at which his presence was required. A pre-trial Huntley hearing was started in . He said, 'Right over there by the dumps, we have a spot where we put people there and they haven't found them for weeks and months.' The defense asks for a Sandoval hearing. 1300 N Semoran Blvd #195, Orlando FL 32807, Local: 407-255-2164Toll-Free: 888-241-8181, 626 RXR Plaza, 6th Floor, West Tower Dellacona testified that Ventimiglia first made a short trip from the bowling alley to the motorcycle shop in order to decide whether the murder could be accomplished there. Considered separately the third and fourth sentences of the testimony quoted above refer only to prior killings by defendants and should have been excluded because not relevant to or in any way probative of the charges being tried. Dellacona's recitation of the discussion between and with defendants concerning where the murder was to take place is the subject of this appeal. Together the four sentences bore directly on issues material to the prosecution's case: that there was an agreement between Russo and Ventimiglia and that the agreement was to kill and to do so in a way that might avoid discovery. As ultimately detailed before the jury it was as follows: "Benny said that they would take him [Mattana] to 'their spot'. Forest Hills, New York 11375, Local: 718-280-1196Toll-Free: 888-241-8181. Molineaux evidence cannot be used to prove that the Defendant is guilty of the crime charged because he had committed other, or similar crimes in the past. den. Under this rule, prosecutors can bring in proof of a defendant's prior bad acts or crimes not to show criminal propensity, but to "establish motive, opportunity, intent, common scheme or plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake or accident." In Pennsylvania, the Doctrine of Chances is a narrow exception which operates similarly to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), which bars evidence of prior bad acts for the purpose of establishing propensity to commit a certain crime, but allows such evidence for other purposes. 0000002753 00000 n Defendant was charged with assaulting his girlfriend. All rights reserved. Earlier this year, during comedian Bill Cosbys retrial for sexual assault charges, prosecutors in Pennsylvania utilized the Doctrine of Chances as a way to call five other accusers to testify against Cosby. Important in the weighing process will also be how the evidence comes into the case, that is, whether at the instance of the People initially, or in rebuttal to a defense offered by defendant (People v Tas, 51 NY2d 915; People v Santarelli, supra; see People v Allweiss, supra). 0000013327 00000 n If the case proceeds to trial however, the prosecution may attempt to bring in evidence of Weinsteins similar past behavior, for the purpose of establishing a pattern of sexual assaults. I had said, 'You mean you done it before?' It is not clear, for instance, that the papers originally submitted to the hearing court were also submitted to the trial court, or whether the trial court considered them. FRIEDMAN: Prosecutors in the case of Harvey Weinstein say he committed sex crimes against a number of women. If the People elect to attempt to use such evidence, they are to seek a preliminary ruling and hearing by this Court before introducing any . . Specifically, the People sought to admit, and defendant [*5] moved to preclude, evidence of the underlying facts pertaining to the prior convictions to which defendant pleaded guilty. << pretrial notice of the People's intention to offer [Molineux] evidence . The name of the hearing process refers to the case of People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 (1901), which established the process as precedent.[1]. For instance GRUBER: If there is a certain burglar known as the rose burglar and he always leaves a yellow rose at the scene of the crime and in this case, the defendant left a yellow rose at the scene of the crime, well, those yellow rose burglaries are not just prior bad acts. One day, the athletic director opens his locker at the club. The reference in the prosecutor's summation to defendants' privilege not to testify was rendered harmless, both defendants having specifically requested the Trial Judge to charge that the jury could draw no inference from their not testifying (CPL 300.10, subd 2). If the prosecutor wishes to . [*359]. People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233 (1987). Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur. 0000002270 00000 n The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Ronald SCHWARTZ, Defendant. People v Hoey, 2016 NY Slip Op 07150, 1st Dept 11-1-16, CRIMINAL LAW (DEFENDANT WAS NOT PRESENT AT AN OFF-THE-RECORD DISCUSSION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR UNCHARGED OFFENSES; DEFENDANT WAS THEREFORE DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO BE PRESENT AT A MATERIAL STAGE OF HIS TRIAL)/MOLINEUX/VENTIMIGLIA HEARING(DEFENDANT WAS NOT PRESENT AT AN OFF-THE-RECORD DISCUSSION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR UNCHARGED OFFENSES; DEFENDANT WAS THEREFORE DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO BE PRESENT AT A MATERIAL STAGE OF HIS TRIAL)MATERIAL STAGE OF TRIAL (CRIMINAL LAW,DEFENDANT WAS NOT PRESENT AT AN OFF-THE-RECORD DISCUSSION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR UNCHARGED OFFENSES; DEFENDANT WAS THEREFORE DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO BE PRESENT AT A MATERIAL STAGE OF HIS TRIAL). stream Site by CurlyHost| Privacy Policy. In view of the potential for prejudice in such testimony, however, a prosecutor who intends to adduce it before the jury should first obtain a ruling from the Trial Judge by offering the testimony out of the presence of the jury, and the Trial Judge should exclude any part of it that is not directly probative of the crimes charged. Molineux-Ventimiglia Hearing A Molineux-Ventimiglia hearing will be held before the trial judge before the commencement of jury selection. His father was a politician in Brooklyn. V. MOTION for TIME to FILE FUTURE MOTIONS This motion is denied. 93 N.Y.2d 1002, 695 N.Y.S.2d 748, 717 N.E.2d 1085 [attempted murder; prior drug trafficking]; also People v. Holmes, 260 A.D.2d 942, 690 N.Y.S.2d 292, lv. to app. 81 N.Y.2d 761, 594 N.Y.S.2d 723, 610 N.E.2d 396; People v. Young, 178 A.D.2d 571, 577 N.Y.S.2d 657, app. den. den. Tracy Connor, Harvey Weinstein surrenders to NYC police, is charged with rape, NBC News (May 25, 2018), https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/harvey-weinstein-scandal/harvey-weinstein-surrenders-nyc-police-station-face-sex-charges-n877416. The probative value must be weighed against the prejudice the evidence would cause the defendant. In a pretrial motion, the Montgomery County District Attorney wrote, as the number of victims reporting similar, drug-facilitated sexual assaults by defendant increases, the likelihood that his conduct was unintentional decreases defendants prior bad acts are admissible under the doctrine of chances to negate the presence of any non-criminal intent and, concomitantly, to establish an absence of mistake.. Attempts to categorize situations in which evidence of prior crime is admissible have yielded Molineux' well-known listing (168 NY, at p 293) of "(1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the others; (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial", but even that listing is acknowledged to be "merely illustrative" (People v Vails, supra, at p 368) and "not exhaustive" (People v Santarelli, 49 NY2d 241, 248) or capable of statement with "categorical precision" (People v Molineux, supra, at p 293). HUn6}Wva+nuZ,dQ-q+Iw-C The Information presented at this site should not be construed as formal legal advice, nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. den., 92 N.Y.2d 925, 680 N.Y.S.2d 466, 703 N.E.2d 278; People v. McClain, 250 A.D.2d 871, 672 N.Y.S.2d 503, lv. The Court of Appeals has referred to a Ventimiglia Hearing in cases where proof of prior crimes was admitted to show the charged crime was committed (e.g., People v. Spotford, 85 N.Y.2d 593, 627 N.Y.S.2d 295, 650 N.E.2d 1296 [assault; four uncharged crimes involving assaults]; also People v. Rodriguez, 85 N.Y.2d 586, 627 N.Y.S.2d 292, 650 N.E.2d 1293; People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 525 N.Y.S.2d 7, 519 N.E.2d 8081 ); to People v. Molineux, supra, but not the hearing, in a similar situation (People v. Till, 87 N.Y.2d 835, 637 N.Y.S.2d 681, 661 N.E.2d 153-attempted murder; uncharged robbery); and to a Ventimiglia Hearing where there was evidence of prior conduct not constituting direct evidence of a crime of the defendant (People v. Maher, 89 N.Y.2d 456, 654 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 677 N.E.2d 728-murder; victim's statements concerning prior violent acts of the defendant toward her). The email address cannot be subscribed. 286, but allowed for in People v. Santarelli, 49 N.Y.2d 241, 425 N.Y.S.2d 77, 401 N.E.2d 199. The First Department held defendants right to be present at a material stage of his trial had been violated: [T]he arguments on admissibility were conducted before two different judges, a year apart, and defendant was not present the second time, when the attorneys conferred with the judge who considered their arguments and made rulings. 0000000968 00000 n There is no litmus paper test for determining when the probative value of the evidence outweighs its potential for prejudice. FTX Fallout: How Deep Does the Fraud Run? There is, moreover, a greater probability of error, and consequent waste of scarce judicial resources, when evidentiary rulings are made during trial than in the more relaxed atmosphere of an inquiry out of the presence of the jury. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Thus, this hearing should more appropriately be denominated a Molineux Hearing, as it is concerned with the admission of the prior crime committed by the defendant, which tends to implicate him in the commission of the present crime by demonstrating a consciousness of guilt. FRIEDMAN: That's law professor Aya Gruber. This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. Chin, J. If Harvey Weinstein is convicted of sex crimes in New York, it may be because prosecutors were able to call as witnesses women who claim to be survivors even though they are not named in the charges. To be inextricably interwoven in the Vails sense the evidence must be explanatory of the acts done or words used in the otherwise admissible part of the evidence. In People v Santarelli (49 NY2d 241, 249, supra), we noted the particularity with which a Trial Judge should evaluate (indeed, parse would be a better word) such evidence. FRIEDMAN: Reporters started looking into Roland. 89 N.Y.2d 983, 656 N.Y.S.2d 741, 678 N.E.2d 1357). Molineux exceptions." People v. Pham, 118 A.D.3d 1159 (3rd Dep't 2014); People v. . ABA Journal (May 31, 2018), http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/harvey_weinstein_is_indicted_could_other_accusers_testify_at_trial. to app. to app. Moreover, the prosecutor's reference to the "where, why and how the murder was committed in the very remote section" where it was, while not including the words "premeditation" and [*361] "agreement", sufficiently presented the purposes for which the testimony was offered as the purposes for which we now hold the Trial Judge correctly admitted it, to withstand defendants' argument (predicated on the holding of People v Zackowitz, 254 NY 192, 199-200, supra) that to sustain admission of the evidence is to treat them unfairly. While that was not done in the instant case the portion of the statement that may have been excluded had it been done is essentially cumulative of the part which was admissible. The judge decides Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. %PDF-1.5 In People v Robinson (68 NY2d 541, 544-545 [1986 . Copyright 2020 NPR. 93 N.Y.2d 1004, 695 N.Y.S.2d 750, 717 N.E.2d 1087). 79 N.Y.2d 955, 583 N.Y.S.2d 209, 592 N.E.2d 817; People v. Linton, 166 A.D.2d 670, 561 N.Y.S.2d 259, app. Lawyers and judges say Molineau (ph). den. The error is not reversible, however, because the necessary implication of the fifth and sixth sentences put before the jury the fact that defendants had murdered more than once before ("we put people there and they haven't found them for weeks and months" [emphasis supplied]). The menacing charges were reduced to a violation and the case was resolved in a satisfactory manner for the Coalition Member. Defendant submits an affirmation in opposition. A year before trial, a Molineux/Ventimiglia hearing was held in the defendant's presence, but the judge never ruled on the admissibility of prior uncharged offenses. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Although several women have alleged that Weinstein committed these and similar crimes, the indictment brought by the Manhattan District Attorneys Office only named two victims. Evidence of prior bad acts can be admitted in order to establish something other than propensity such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. In the Cosby trial, the five other accusers had reported sexual assaults similar to the sexual assault on the victim by Cosby. The rule excluding evidence of uncharged crimes is based upon the human tendency more readily "to believe in the guilt of an accused person when it is known or suspected that he has previously committed a similar crime" (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264, 313; People v Allweiss, 48 NY2d 40, 47; see People v Zackowitz, 254 NY 192, 198) and is intended to eliminate the danger that a jury may convict to punish the person portrayed by the evidence before them even though not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt of the crime of which he is charged. Evidence from other witnesses corroborative of Dellacona's testimony was also presented. 0000003871 00000 n The trial court conducted an initial Ventimiglia hearing to address the prosecution's Molineux application, but postponed issuance of a ruling. At a Sandoval hearing, the judge decides whether evidence of your criminal record will be admissible at trial, if you choose to testify. FRIEDMAN: Roland Molineux won his appeal, and the rule was named after him in New York, where his case set a precedent for what evidence is allowed at trial. They show a pattern, right? Here, as neither a summary grant or denial is warranted, this Court grants a Huntley [*7]hearing on the question of the admissibility of any statements. In a criminal case, this means that the prosecution wants to introduce evidence that the Defendant committed some other act. I'll stick with that for this story. Consciousness of guilt is not a category enumerated in People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 61 N.E. Except AYA GRUBER: That rule is riddled with exceptions. While he has entered a plea of not guilty, some experts believe the case may end with a plea bargain. 0000000760 00000 n SCHECTER: You know, because a person could have a propensity for criminal behavior but not necessarily have committed that particular crime, so that became known as the Molineux Rule in New York. The Defendant requested a Sandoval/Molineux/Ventimiglia hearing, which was granted and was held pursuant to CPL 340.43 prior to trial. to app. Cross-racial ID 26 Adverse inference 26 Coercion 27 den. Cosby was tried twice. A Molineux hearing is a New York State pre-trial hearing on the admissibility of evidence of prior uncharged crimes by the defendant in a criminal trial. Inside, he finds a medicine bottle in a Tiffany box. Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County. 241-242 [1987]; People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 360 [1981].) A year before trial, a Molineux/Ventimiglia hearing was held in the defendants presence, but the judge never ruled on the admissibility of prior uncharged offenses. Once that burden is met, the defendant bears the ultimate burden of proving that the . They show a common scheme. In most cases evidence of prior uncharged crimes is not admissible because of its potential prejudicial effect. Here the third and fourth sentences were unnecessary to an understanding of the other parts of the testimony and should therefore, have been excluded. The theory of the prosecution was that Ardito had hired defendants to kill Mattana because he was about to leave her for another woman. But he brought it home, and his landlady took it for a headache. 0000001122 00000 n DEFENDANT WAS NOT PRESENT AT AN OFF-THE-RECORD DISCUSSION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY https://www.newyorkappellatedigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/NYAppelateLogo-White-1.png. den. Recounting as they did defendants' admissions as to what they planned and why, the four sentences compellingly demonstrate both premeditation and conspiracy to murder. Defendants objected that "testimony of another alleged murder committed by Mr. Russo and Mr. Ventimiglia" was inadmissible and moved for a mistrial. 0000002482 00000 n Against that background, the first two and last two sentences of the testimony here in issue were unquestionably admissible. His defense attorney has stated that if the case does go to trial, he will consider attempting to sever the rape charges from the charge of criminal sexual act, and proceed with two separate trials. He says Molineux the way the family does. According to Dellacona, Ardito had agreed to lend him money and had instructed him to meet her at 7:30 P.M. on April 27, 1976 at Exit 19 of the Southern State Parkway. The "spot" referred to was shown by later testimony to be located at Howard Beach. Hb```f`` 6Pce- *: Jhwc#b>Y,) ?V' endstream endobj 37 0 obj 97 endobj 24 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 19 0 R /Resources 25 0 R /Contents 31 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 25 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /Font << /TT2 27 0 R /TT4 26 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 33 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 30 0 R >> >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 150 /Widths [ 602 0 602 0 0 0 0 602 602 602 0 0 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 0 0 0 0 0 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 0 602 602 602 602 602 602 0 602 0 602 0 602 0 602 0 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 602 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /IEJAEI+CentSchbookMonoBT /FontDescriptor 29 0 R >> endobj 27 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 119 /Widths [ 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 609 0 576 681 0 0 0 0 0 282 0 0 0 692 0 0 0 0 461 583 0 0 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 0 347 398 350 282 0 470 252 0 389 227 678 466 419 450 0 325 331 319 461 403 690 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /IEJACG+ZapfChanMdBT /FontDescriptor 28 0 R >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 811 /CapHeight 609 /Descent -315 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -193 -316 998 811 ] /FontName /IEJACG+ZapfChanMdBT /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 /FontFile2 32 0 R >> endobj 29 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 952 /CapHeight 671 /Descent -235 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -18 -236 649 952 ] /FontName /IEJAEI+CentSchbookMonoBT /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 102 /XHeight 468 /FontFile2 34 0 R >> endobj 30 0 obj [ /ICCBased 35 0 R ] endobj 31 0 obj << /Length 1043 /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream He gave a complete account of the events leading up to the murder of Benjamin Mattana, which took place in the early morning hours of April 28, 1976. People v. Cass, 784 N.Y.S.2d 346 (Kings County 2004). CPL ' 240.43. FRIEDMAN: Prosecutors in the case of Harvey Weinstein say he committed sex crimes against a number of women. A "Molineaux hearing" refers to a pre-trial hearing on the admissibility Molineaux evidence cannot be used to prove that the Defendant is guilty of the crime charged because he had committed other, or similar crimes in the past. The trial was held before a different judge who conducted an off-the-record conference about the uncharged offenses at which defendant was not present.